There is a word that frequently makes me stumble when I hear or read it. Even though it is being used in different contexts, there always seems to be an underlying sense of urgency, importance, and certainty. It is the word birthright. I have come across humans’ ‘birthrights’ to: freedom, a liveable environment, protection from harm, work, healthcare, joy, fulfilling your purpose, and quite a few more.
As beautiful and empowering as this concept might sound, there are some concerns that it brings up within me. Often, birthright quietly smuggles in the assumption that existence comes with guaranteed entitlements; that being born is like receiving a voucher, a claim, or a title deed; and that the world somehow owes the individual something simply for arriving.
While this framing might make sense through the perspective of modernity – where life is organized around ownership, contracts, individual sovereignty, and accumulation – from a wider-angle lens, it is oddly specific and historically recent. In many non-modern ontologies, being born is not a claim but an arrival into obligations: to land, to ancestors, to those not yet born, to non-human kin, and to the continuity of life itself.
From my standpoint, it seems like we are not born with rights so much as with limits, dependencies, and responsibilities. This might be an uncomfortable idea to sit with – especially compared to a list of neatly phrased birthrights. Responsibilities can feel like burdens and lead to inconvenience. It disturbs the clean moral math of modernity which starts with rights and concludes protection and innocence. But life doesn’t do spreadsheets. Life does compost.
Continue reading “Rethinking Rights: From Entitlement to Relationship”